• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

The Glen Park Association

Up-to-the-minute news from Glen Park

  • Home
  • Glen Park Association
    • About the Glen Park Association
    • Join the GPA
    • GPA Board Contacts
    • GPA Meeting Minutes
    • Bylaws
    • Neighborhood boundaries
  • News Stories
    • Glen Park News
    • Editor’s Picks
  • Greenway
    • About
    • Greenway Plan
  • GPA Grants Program
  • Crime & Safety
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Volunteer Sign Ups
    • Event Submission
    • Author Submissions

A note from Dave Emanuel, member of the SF Forest Alliance, on Glen Canyon

February 20, 2013 by Elizabeth Weise

CARING FOR OUR CANYON

On your next visit to Glen Canyon Park you will see a stark contrast in the landscape where majestic Eucalyptus stood for more than a century lining Alms Road. The removal of these signature trees over the past two weeks has been the source of heated controversy surrounding the facilities renovation project for almost a year before it started.

 

Jan 9, 2013. Photo SF Forest Alliance.
Jan 9, 2013. Photo SF Forest Alliance.

The project never should have pitted the playground and tennis courts against the trees. But the time for passionate pleas has passed, just like the trees, and it’s now time to work on reuniting our community.

 

The way forward is going to require broader community involvement, compromise, and changes to the policies and processes that did not serve us well.  Working together, though, we can further common goals of keeping our canyon safe, healthy and accessible to recreational users and the diverse species and wildlife that thrive in the ecosystems that exist in few urban areas.

 

In order to achieve success we are asking for transparency and clarity with projects and tree management throughout the canyon in the following ways:

 

Jan 14, 2013. Photo courtesy of SF Forest Alliance.
Jan 14, 2013. Photo courtesy of SF Forest Alliance.
  • Routine maintenance – conduct tree assessments more frequently than once every 50 years and perform maintenance on a routine basis. If that means shifting money from other San Francisco Rec and Park budgets in order to do so, heed the call this is a critical issue for the canyon.
  • Tree safety – if a tree poses a legitimate threat to the imminent safety of people the tree should be removed. In March of last year 24 trees among 627 evaluated were identified by the Rec and Park hired arborist as being hazardous yet 22 of them have not been remediated as of today.
  • “Poor Suitability” – dispense with this tree assessment category altogether. It uses a hodgepodge of criteria that factors in whether a tree is too big, the wrong species or invasive, among other things that have little or nothing to do with safety. Correspondence to the arborist shows that Rec and Park staff who are overseeing the current tree removal do not even understand what “poor suitability” entails. Neither do we.
  • Removal notification – mark every tree with a clear and specific explanation for why it’s being recommended for removal. While a generic 30-day notice has been placed on doomed trees, there’s no reason why a listing cannot be maintained online, as well. And residents should be able to sign up for automatic alerts notifying them when trees get placed on the list and the reason it will be removed.
  • Incorporate trees – find creative ways for preserving trees in project design, not simply removing them for interfering with architectural grandeur.
  • Community engagement – seek participation of the canyon’s visitors and neighbors throughout the year. Challenge us for solutions to complex and controversial issues, and solicit our ideas rather than just seeking our validation for variations of a standard mold that is applied to all parks.
  • True representation – no one group or organization speaks for the thousands of people who have a stake in the care of our canyon. Seek diverse and wide participation in the community meetings – including those tasked with organizing and hosting them – that play an important role in determining how taxpayer funds are allocated. And it’s time for those watching from the sidelines to get involved.

 

It’s evident from the standing room-only crowds and rancor during many community meetings held by our district supervisor and other groups after the project’s complete plan was disclosed that the process needs real improvement.

 

There are many good things planned for the canyon, and our community lobbied hard and voted together to secure substantial funding for continued work.

 

Now is the time to learn from the significant problems we encountered and fix the process in order to reach a true semblance of consensus going forward. Our canyon is worth it.

 

— Dave Emanuel lives in Glen Park. He is a member of the San Francisco Forest Alliance,  a nonprofit organization that cares deeply about the stewardship of parks, open space and urban forests (http://sfforest.net).

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Primary Sidebar

IMPORTANT UPCOMING DATES


Friends of Glen Canyon’s
Glen Canyon Habitat Restoration
Every third Saturday 9 a.m to noon
Sign up here

Glen Park Library

Subscribe to this Newsletter

Sign Up for Glen Park Association News Updates

* indicates required

Glen Park Rec. Center

Renew Your Glen Park Association Membership for 2023

Join the Glen Park Association and help promote our community’s interests. Together, we can secure improvement funds, publicize neighborhood concerns and strive to speak as one voice on neighborhood and city issues.

Membership in the Glen Park Association is only $10 annually and can be purchased online.

Glen Park Association Advertising Sponsors

JE_Digital Small Space Ad
GPA Ad- Perez Construction ad 6.27.22 v Glen Park
martin
moroco
JE_Digital Small Space Ad
GPA Ad- Perez Construction ad 6.27.22 v Glen Park
martin
moroco
previous arrow
next arrow
Shadow

Current Weather & Air Quality

Glen Park featured on…

FacebookSF ChronInstagramTwitter

Join the Glen Park Association on Facebook

Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons
Glen Park Association is in Glen Park.
1 day ago
Glen Park Association

Happy 4th Anniversary to @crosstowntrail !!

We love having hikers explore the Glen Park neighborhood and our beautiful Glen Park Greenway!

#glenpark #sanfrancisco @glen_parkmerchantssf @rafaelmandelmand8
... See MoreSee Less

Happy 4th Anniversary to @crosstowntrail !! 

We love having hikers explore the Glen Park neighborhood and our beautiful Glen Park Greenway!

#glenpark #sanfrancisco @glen_parkmerchantssf @rafaelmandelmand8
View on Facebook
· Share
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linked In Share by Email
View Comments
  • Likes: 9
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

Glen Park Association is in Glen Park.
1 week ago
Glen Park Association

Bicycle Mass rolling through Glen Park this evening of the last Friday of the month!🚲🚲🚲

#CriticalMass @glen_parkmerchantssf
... See MoreSee Less

Bicycle Mass rolling through Glen Park this evening of the last Friday of  the month!🚲🚲🚲

#criticalmass @glen_parkmerchantssf
View on Facebook
· Share
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linked In Share by Email
View Comments
  • Likes: 6
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

Blog Roll

Coyote Yipps
Friends of Noe Valley Rec Center
Glen Park Neighborhoods History Project
Open SF History
Sunnyside Conservatory
Sunnyside History
Sunnyside Neighborhood Association
Tramps of San Francisco
Upper Noe Neighbors

Copyright © 2023 · Metro Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in